60% of C-Suite Time Is Wasted on Decisions That Could Be Automated.
- Marina Ryazantseva

- Jan 2
- 15 min read
Here's How CFOs, COOs, and VPs Are Cloning Their Decision-Making in 2026

Let me ask you something.
How many decisions did you make yesterday?
Not the big ones. The small ones.
"Should we approve this expense?"
"Which vendor proposal makes sense?"
"What's the priority for this week?"
"How do I respond to this client issue?"
"Does this strategy align with our goals?"
If you're like most SMB owners I work with, you made 50–100 micro-decisions yesterday.
And your team is waiting on another 50 today.
Here's the problem: You've become the bottleneck.
You're working 80-hour weeks, but half of it is just being the decision-making hub for everyone else.

There's a better way.
What if you could clone your decision-making process? Not replace your judgment — replicate your thinking patterns so your team can move faster when you're not available.
This isn't science fiction. It's what I call building your CEO's Digital Double.
And in this article, I'm going to show you exactly how to do it.
Here's what we'll cover:
Why you're the bottleneck (and why working harder won't fix it)
What a "Digital Double" actually is (and what it's not)
Which decisions you can safely automate vs. which you can't
The exact frameworks and AI tools to build this system
Real examples from business owners who've done it
Your 60-day implementation roadmap
Let's get started.
The Real Problem: You're Too Good at Your Job
Here's what happened:
You built a business. You developed instincts. You learned what works through trial, error, and expensive mistakes.
Now you have pattern recognition that your team doesn't have yet.
So they come to you for everything:
"What do you think about this?"
"Should we move forward?"
"How would you handle this?"
"Can you review this before we send it?"
And you say yes. Because that's what good leaders do, right?
Wrong.
Every time you're the answer, you're teaching your team to wait instead of think.
What This Costs You:
Time:
2–4 hours/day answering questions that could be answered with a framework
15–20 "quick sync" meetings per week that derail deep work
Evenings and weekends catching up on actual CEO work
Growth:
Strategic projects get deprioritized
Business development happens in stolen moments
You can't scale because everything runs through you
Team Development:
People stop developing judgment
Decision-making skills atrophy
You're building dependency, not capability
The shift you need: From "I'll decide" to "Here's how we decide."
That's what your Digital Double does.
What a "Digital Double" Actually Is (And Isn't)
Let me be crystal clear about what we're building here.
Your Digital Double is NOT:
❌ An AI that replaces you❌ A chatbot that answers random questions❌ A complex system that requires coding❌ Something that makes decisions without you
Your Digital Double IS:
✅ A documented thinking process your team can reference✅ AI-powered frameworks that replicate your decision-making patterns✅ Executive summary automation that gives you the insights you need, fast✅ A system that frees you from being the bottleneck while maintaining quality
Think of it like this:
Instead of your team asking, "What would you do?"
They reference your Digital Double and get: "Here's how [Your Name] typically thinks through this type of decision, based on our priorities, past patterns, and current context."
You're still in control. You're just not in every single transaction.
The Decision Matrix: What to Automate vs. What to Keep

Not every decision should go through your Digital Double.
Here's how to sort them:
✅ AUTOMATE THESE (80% of daily decisions):
Operational Decisions:
Expense approvals under $X
Vendor selection based on criteria
Project prioritization within departments
Standard client requests
Resource allocation for routine work
Analytical Decisions:
Executive summaries from long reports
Competitive intel synthesis
Performance data interpretation
Meeting notes to action items
Email prioritization and response drafting
Communication Decisions:
Response templates for common scenarios
Tone and messaging alignment
Internal communication drafting
Client update formatting
🤔 SEMI-AUTOMATE THESE (15% of decisions):
Strategic Decisions with Clear Criteria:
Hiring decisions (AI screens, you decide)
Partnership opportunities (AI evaluates, you choose)
Investment priorities (AI models scenarios, you select)
Market expansion timing (AI analyzes data, you judge)
Your Digital Double provides:
Analysis and options
Pros/cons based on your criteria
Recommendation with reasoning
You make final call
⛔ NEVER AUTOMATE THESE (5% of decisions):
High-Stakes Strategic Calls:
Major pivots or business model changes
Key partnership negotiations
Crisis management
Culture-defining decisions
Situations requiring nuanced human judgment
The principle: Automate the pattern-based. Elevate the strategic.
How to Build Your Digital Double: The Simple 3-Step Framework

Here's the truth: You don't need to be technical to build this.
You just need to be intentional about three things:
Step 1: Write Down How You Think (Week 1–2)
What you're doing: Capturing the patterns you already use to make decisions.
How to do it:
Use a basic Google Doc or Word document, along with any AI voice agent (such as GPT or Gemini live agent as your daily diary on the go), and respond to these questions:
About Your Business:
What are we trying to accomplish this year? (3–5 big goals)
What do we absolutely never compromise on? (your non-negotiables)
How do I know if we're winning? (your top 3–5 metrics)
About Your Decisions:
Pick your 3 most common decision types. For each one, write:
What do I always check before saying yes?
What's an automatic "no" for me?
What questions do I ask?
Example:
"When evaluating vendors:
Must have experience in our industry
Price within 20% of market rate
Responds to questions within 24 hours
Has at least 3 references I can check
Auto-no if they can't show past work"
About How You Communicate:
How would I describe my communication style? (Direct? Warm? Data-driven? Storytelling?)
What phrases do I use all the time?
How do I like to structure emails? (Answer first? Context first? Bullets?)
That's it. No fancy frameworks. Just write down what you already do instinctively.
Time commitment: 30 minutes per day for one week = 3.5 hours total
Step 2: Put It Into One Simple Tool (Week 3–4)
What you're doing: Creating a "thinking tool" your team can use when you're not there.
The tool: ChatGPT Custom GPT (that's it—just one tool)
What you need:
ChatGPT Plus or Team account ($20–30/month)
The document you created in Step 1
1–2 hours to set it up
How to set it up (non-technical version):
Log into ChatGPT
Click "Explore GPTs" then "Create"
Copy/paste your Step 1 document into the instructions
Give it a name: "[Your Name]'s Decision Assistant"
Test it with a real decision you made last week
Share the link with your team
That's literally it. No coding. No complicated setup.
What your team does:
Instead of texting you: "Should we approve this expense?"
They ask your Digital Double: "We have a $3,500 expense request for new software. Here's what it does. Should we approve?"
Your Digital Double responds using YOUR criteria: "Based on [Your Name]'s framework: Check if it's under the $5K threshold (yes), aligns with Q1 priorities (need to verify), and team has confirmed it solves a clear problem (yes). If it aligns with priorities, approve. If not, escalate to [Your Name]."
Built-in features you already have (no extra tools needed):
If you use Google Workspace:
Gmail already has AI-powered email sorting and suggested replies
Google Meet now has automatic transcription and summary notes
Google Docs has AI writing assistance built in
If you use Microsoft 365:
Outlook has AI prioritization and suggested responses (Copilot)
Teams has automatic meeting transcripts and recap
Word has AI writing assistance
You don't need 10 different tools. Use what you already pay for.
Step 3: Train Your Team to Use It (Week 5–6)
What you're doing: Making sure people actually use the system (this is where most fail).
How to do it:
Week 5: Show them how it works
60-minute team meeting
Bring 3–5 real decisions from last month
Show them: "Here's what I decided. Now let's ask the Digital Double. See? Same answer."
Let them ask questions
Give everyone the link
Week 6: Practice together
Another 60-minute session
Each person brings one pending decision
They use the Digital Double while you watch
You confirm if the answer is right or needs adjusting
Build confidence together
The safety rule: For the first 30 days, team must show you the Digital Double's answer before acting on it.
Why this works:
Team sees you validate good outputs → they trust it
You catch any mistakes before they matter
System gets better based on real use
After 30 days, you gradually let go
Time commitment: 2 hours of training total, plus spot-checking for a month
Total setup time: About 10 hours over 6 weeks. Time you get back: 15–20 hours per week, ongoing
That's it. Three steps. One main tool. No technical degree required.

Real-World Example: Window Manufacturing Company CEO
Let me show you exactly what this looks like in practice.
Company Profile:
Business: Premier Window Systems — custom vinyl and aluminum window manufacturer
Size: 52 employees (production, sales, operations, admin)
Revenue: $8.5M annually
CEO: Alex Martinez (18 years in manufacturing, 12 years with the company)
Market: Commercial and residential construction in the Southwest US
Before Digital Double: Alex Was Drowning
Alex's Typical Day (recorded over 2 weeks):
Morning (6:00am–12:00pm):
Arrives early to "catch up" on strategic work before interruptions start
18–25 Slack messages overnight needing decisions
12–15 emails requiring approval or input
3–4 production questions: "Should we rush this order?" "Can we substitute this material?"
2–3 sales questions: "Should we discount for this client?" "Is this project a good fit?"
Afternoon (12:00pm–6:00pm):
4–5 meetings (production review, sales pipeline, vendor issues, budget review)
Another 15–20 interruptions: "Quick question..." "Can you look at this?" "What do you think?"
Approval queue building: purchase orders, expense reports, hiring decisions
Actual strategic work: zero
Evening (6:00pm–9:00pm):
Catches up on what got pushed during the day
Reviews proposals that need responses
Thinks about growth strategy (exhausted, unfocused)
Weekend:
Sunday afternoon: planning for the week, catching up on industry research
The Numbers Before (Tracked Over 30 Days):
Time Allocation:
Decision-making/approvals: 38 hours/week
Meetings (mostly operational): 12 hours/week
Email/Slack management: 8 hours/week
Strategic work (growth, partnerships, innovation): 4 hours/week
Total work week: 62 hours
Business Impact:
Average decision response time: 18–24 hours (team waiting constantly)
Project delays due to approval bottlenecks: 3–5 per month
Lost opportunities: 2 major bids missed deadlines because Alex couldn't review in time
Team escalations to Alex: 127 per week
Alex's stress level: 8.5/10 (self-reported)
Specific Pain Points:
"Production would stop because they needed approval on a $1,200 material substitution. Sales would lose momentum because they waited 36 hours for me to review a proposal. My operations manager knew what to do but kept asking me anyway 'just to be sure.' I was the bottleneck, and I knew it, but I didn't know how to fix it without losing control." — Alex
What We Built: Alex's Digital Double
Timeline: 6 weeks implementation (while running the business)
Week 1–2: Documented Alex's Decision Patterns
Captured Alex's frameworks for:
Material Substitution Decisions
Cost variance: within 8% of spec'd material
Performance specs: must meet or exceed original
Lead time impact: won't delay project completion
Supplier reliability: tier 1 or 2 vendors only
Customer impact: residential = more flexible, commercial = strict adherence
Pricing & Discount Approvals
Standard margin target: 38–42%
Discount authority: up to 12% for orders over $50K
Strategic accounts: up to 18% with justification
Auto-decline: any deal below 25% margin
Rush order premium: minimum 15% upcharge
Vendor Selection Criteria
On-time delivery history: 95%+ required
Quality certification: ISO certified or equivalent
Payment terms: net 30 preferred, net 45 acceptable
Price: within 10% of current suppliers
Capacity: can handle 20% volume spike
Project Fit Assessment
Minimum project value: $15K (exceptions for strategic relationships)
Timeline: must fit production schedule with 2-week buffer
Scope clarity: detailed specs provided, no vague "we'll figure it out"
Payment terms: 50% deposit, 50% on completion (commercial) or full payment (residential under $30K)
Red flags: clients who've disputed invoices elsewhere, unrealistic timelines, scope creep history
Week 3–4: Built the Digital Double
Primary Tool: ChatGPT Team ($30/month)
Created Custom GPT: "Alex's Decision Framework — Premier Window Systems"
Uploaded context:
Company mission and 2026 strategic priorities
Complete vendor evaluation scorecards from past 18 months
Project acceptance/rejection memos with reasoning
Pricing framework and margin guidelines
Quality standards and material specifications
Decision Escalation Matrix:
Decision Type | Authority | Requires Alex |
Material substitution under $2K | Production manager + Digital Double | No |
Material substitution $2K–$10K | Ops director + Digital Double | Review within 24 hrs |
Material substitution over $10K | Alex decides | Yes |
Discounts up to 12% | Sales manager + Digital Double | No |
Discounts 12%–18% | Sales director + Digital Double | Alex approval |
Discounts over 18% | Alex decides | Yes |
Vendor changes (existing category) | Purchasing + Digital Double | No |
New vendor category | Alex decides | Yes |
Projects $15K–$75K (standard scope) | Sales + Digital Double | No |
Projects $75K–$200K | Sales director + Digital Double | Review proposal |
Projects over $200K or non-standard | Alex decides | Yes |
Week 5–6: Team Training
Session 1 (60 min): Introduction and demo
Showed team how Alex thinks through decisions
Live examples: 5 recent decisions, compared Digital Double output to Alex's actual reasoning
Team reaction: "That's exactly what Alex would say"
Session 2 (90 min): Hands-on practice
Each department head brought 3 pending decisions
Walked through using Digital Double together
Alex confirmed: "Yes, execute" or "Here's what I'd adjust"
Built confidence in real-time
Critical rule for first 30 days: All Digital Double recommendations shared with Alex before execution (Slack channel: #digital-double-decisions)
Results After 90 Days: The Transformation
Time Impact (Measured Weekly):
Metric | Before | After | Change |
Decision-making/approvals | 38 hrs/week | 11 hrs/week | -71% |
Meetings (operational) | 12 hrs/week | 6 hrs/week | -50% |
Email/Slack management | 8 hrs/week | 4 hrs/week | -50% |
Strategic work | 4 hrs/week | 23 hrs/week | +475% |
Total work week | 62 hrs/week | 44 hrs/week | -29% |
Decision Velocity (Speed of Execution):
Decision Type | Before | After | Improvement |
Material substitutions | 18–24 hrs | 2–4 hrs | 83% faster |
Discount approvals | 12–36 hrs | 1–3 hrs | 92% faster |
Vendor selections | 3–5 days | Same day | 80% faster |
Project go/no-go | 24–48 hrs | 4–6 hrs | 88% faster |
Business Impact (90-Day Period):
Operational Efficiency:
Team escalations to Alex: 127/week → 31/week (-76%)
Project delays due to approval bottlenecks: 3–5/month → 0.5/month (-90%)
Average decision response time: 18–24 hours → 3–5 hours (-79%)
Decisions made independently by team: 18% → 76% (+322%)
Revenue & Growth:
Bids completed on time: 73% → 96% (+23 percentage points)
New strategic partnerships initiated: 0 → 3 (finally had time for business development)
Product line innovation: Started R&D on energy-efficient window line (would have been impossible before)
Win rate on proposals: 31% → 38% (faster response time = better close rate)
Team Development:
Manager confidence in independent decisions: 4.2/10 → 8.7/10 (survey)
Team satisfaction (not waiting on Alex): 5.1/10 → 8.9/10
Decision quality consistency: Maintained 94% alignment with Alex's judgment
Documentation of decisions: 23% → 97% (every decision now has reasoning logged)
Financial Impact (Annualized Projection):
Alex's time value: $175/hour (CEO time) × 27 hours saved/week × 48 weeks = $226,800/year
Faster decision velocity: Estimated $180K in captured opportunities (bids that would have been late)
Tool cost: ChatGPT Team ($30/month × 12) = $360/year
Net ROI: $406,440 gained / $360 invested = 113,000% ROI
The Moment Alex Knew It Worked
Week 4 (30 days in):
The production manager brought up a material substitution question. Instead of immediately asking Alex, he:
Consulted the Digital Double
Got recommendation: "Based on Alex's framework, this substitution meets all criteria: cost within 6%, performance equivalent, supplier is tier 1, won't delay project. Recommend approval. Document in project file."
Posted decision in #digital-double-decisions Slack channel with reasoning
Alex reviewed that evening (15 minutes to check 8 decisions vs. 2 hours to make them individually)
Response: "✅ All good. This is exactly what I would have done."
Week 8:
Sales director needed to approve a 15% discount on a $78K project. Before the Digital Double, she would have sent Alex a long email and waited 24 hours.
Instead:
Asked Digital Double: "Client is requesting 15% discount on $78K window package for a new construction project. They're doing 3 buildings this year, with potential for 12 more next year. Architect's relationship is strategic. What should I do?"
Digital Double response: "This exceeds standard authority (12%) but fits strategic account criteria. Discount justified by: (1) Multi-building relationship, (2) Total potential value ~$900K over 2 years, (3) Architect relationship valuable. Recommend 15% approval with documentation that future projects maintain 35%+ margin. Flag for Alex review, but can move forward."
Maria closed the deal the same day (client was impressed by the fast response)
Alex reviewed that evening: "Perfect call. Exactly what I would have done."
The result: $78K project closed, relationship strengthened, margin acceptable, zero delay.
Before Digital Double: Would have taken 36 hours; client might have gone elsewhere.
Alex's Perspective (90 Days Later):
"The first two weeks were uncomfortable. I kept thinking, 'What if they make the wrong call? What if something goes wrong?' But I realized I wasn't actually worried about the decisions — I was worried about letting go of control.
By week 4, I stopped checking every decision in the Slack channel. I'd review them once daily, and 95% of the time, I just hit the checkmark. My team was making the exact calls I would have made.
The real breakthrough came in week 7. I had a full day — uninterrupted — to work on our energy-efficient window line. No Slack pings. No 'quick questions.' Just deep strategic work. That product line is going to add $1.2M in revenue next year. It would never have happened if I were still the bottleneck.
Now? My team is more confident. They're not waiting on me to think for them. They're thinking like me, using the frameworks we built together. And when they do escalate something to me, it's the right stuff — the decisions that actually need my experience and judgment.
Best money I've ever spent." — Alex Martinez, CEO, Premier Window Systems
Key Success Factors:
What made this work for Alex:
Documented existing patterns (did not invent new ones)
Started with high-volume, low-risk decisions (material subs under $2K, standard discounts)
Built trust gradually (30-day review period before full autonomy)
Kept it simple (one tool, clear escalation rules)
Team training was thorough (not just "here's a tool, figure it out")
Measured results rigorously (tracked time, velocity, quality)
The transformation wasn't about AI. It was about Alex finally documenting what he already knew — and making it accessible to his team.
The AI Tools Stack for Your Digital Double
You don't need a dozen tools. You need the right ONE or TWO.
Here's what actually works:
The Core Tool (Pick ONE)
ChatGPT Plus or Team ($20–30/month)
What it does: Creates your "Digital Double" that thinks like you
Best for: Most businesses, easiest to set up and share
Use it for: Decision frameworks, quick questions, team collaboration
Built-in features: Can read documents, create images, analyze data
Team access: Share one Custom GPT with everyone
Why this is enough: 90% of executives only need ChatGPT. It handles decisions, summaries, communication drafting, and analysis.
What's Already Included in Your Current Software
If you use Google Workspace (Gmail, Meet, Docs):
✅ Gmail AI — Email sorting, priority inbox, smart replies (already included)
✅ Google Meet — Automatic transcripts and meeting summaries (already included)
✅ Google Docs AI — Writing assistance and summarization (already included)
If you use Microsoft 365 (Outlook, Teams, Word):
✅ Copilot in Outlook — Email prioritization and draft responses ($30/month add-on)
✅ Teams — Automatic meeting transcripts and intelligent recap (included)
✅ Copilot in Word — Document analysis and summarization ($30/month add-on)
The point: Check what you already have before buying new tools.
Optional Add-Ons (Only If You Need Them)
For better meeting notes:
Otter.ai ($10–17/month) — If your current meeting tool's transcription isn't good enough
Only add this if: You have critical meetings where you need perfect transcripts
For email management:
SaneBox ($7/month) — If your inbox is completely out of control
Only add this if: You get 100+ emails daily and need automatic sorting
That's it. Seriously.
My Recommendation for Most Executives:
Month 1:
Just use ChatGPT Plus ($20/month)
Use your existing Google/Microsoft tools for meetings and email
Master these before adding anything else
Month 2–3:
Add ONE specialized tool only if you have a specific pain point
Most people never need to add anything else
Total monthly cost: $20–60/month (less than one team lunch)
The principle: Master one tool deeply rather than juggling ten tools poorly.
Common Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)
I've helped dozens of CEOs build Digital Doubles. Here are the mistakes that kill momentum:
Mistake #1: Trying to Automate Everything at Once
What happens:
You get overwhelmed
Team gets confused
System never gets fully implemented
Everyone gives up after 2 weeks
Do this instead:
Pick ONE decision type to automate first
Master it for 30 days
Then add the second
Build momentum through small wins
Mistake #2: Not Training Your Team Properly
What happens:
Team doesn't trust the AI outputs
They still come to you for everything
Digital Double sits unused
You wasted time building something nobody uses
Do this instead:
Invest in proper training (3 sessions minimum)
First 30 days: review all AI outputs together
Celebrate wins when team makes good decisions independently
Create a feedback loop for continuous improvement
Mistake #3: Forgetting to Update Your Digital Double
What happens:
AI makes decisions based on outdated priorities
Recommendations don't reflect current strategy
Team loses confidence in the system
You're back to being the bottleneck
Do this instead:
Quarterly review of decision frameworks
Update after major strategic changes
Add new examples as business evolves
Treat it like a living document, not "set and forget"
Mistake #4: Using AI for Decisions That Require Human Judgment
What happens:
AI makes a questionable recommendation
Damage control required
Trust in entire system erodes
You become MORE cautious about delegation
Do this instead:
Be crystal clear about escalation criteria
Some decisions should always be human
Use AI to inform, not replace judgment on high-stakes calls
When in doubt, escalate
Mistake #5: Not Measuring the Impact
What happens:
You can't prove ROI
Hard to justify continued investment
Don't know what's working vs. what's not
Can't make the case for expansion
Do this instead:
Track time saved weekly
Measure decision velocity (time from question to action)
Monitor decision quality (outcomes vs. predictions)
Document strategic time reclaimed
Simple tracking spreadsheet:
Week | Decisions automated | Time saved | Strategic hours gained | Quality score
The Hard Truth About Delegation
Let me be straight with you.
Building a Digital Double isn't really about AI.
It's about letting go.
And that's hard.
You built this business. You know what works. You've earned the right to be involved in decisions.
But here's what I've learned working with successful CEOs:
The businesses that scale are led by people who replace themselves.
Not because they want to step away.Because they want to step up.
Your Digital Double isn't about doing less. It's about doing what only you can do.
The strategic thinking.The vision casting.The market positioning.The relationship building.
The stuff that actually grows the business.
Everything else? That's what systems are for.
And the beautiful thing about AI is this:
You're not delegating to a person who might leave.You're delegating to a system that captures YOUR thinking and makes it scalable.
Your team gets to learn how you think.Your business gets to move at the speed of decision.And you get to focus on being the CEO, not the bottleneck.
Final Thought: Your Business Shouldn't Depend on You Being Available
I'll leave you with this:
The best businesses I've seen aren't built around heroic founders who work 80-hour weeks.
They're built around systems that work when the founder isn't there.
Your Digital Double is one of those systems.
It's not about replacing your judgment.It's about replicating your thinking so your business can move at the speed of opportunity, not the speed of your calendar.
The CEOs winning in 2026 won't be the hardest workers.
They'll be the ones who cloned their decision-making and freed themselves to do what only they can do.
The question is: will you be one of them?
To your systematic freedom,
Dr. Marina RyazantsevaFounder, AI4Biz Consulting
👉 Ready to build your Digital Double? Book your strategy session here




Comments